Brutalist Practice in 1960’s Berlin Churches: Experimental Interior Spaces

Authors

  • Özlem Balcı Öztürk Kocaeli University
  • Oya Şenyurt Kocaeli Üniversitesi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2611-0075/20038

Keywords:

Post-War Berlin Architecture, Brutalism, Reyner Banham, Church Architecture, Raw Concrete

Abstract

Numerous buildings, especially religious buildings, were destroyed and damaged in Europe during the Second World War. The city of Berlin is among those that suffered losses.

Repairing the damage to churches that have a place in the collective memory and designing new churches played a crucial role in helping people hold on to life again. In the 1960s, new church construction in West Berlin experienced its pick. In this period, which Goldhagen describes as an interregnum between an expiring Modernism and dawning Postmodernism, experimental designs emerged under the influence of Brutalism. This study focuses on brutalist churches built in Berlin in the 1960s: Kaiser Wilhelm Memorial Church, Maria Regina Martyrum Memorial Church, and Paul Gerhardt Church. Defining a point of identity for the city, these churches not only represent a point of social unification for the community but also aim to strengthen the faith. It is possible to capture the same spiritual effect in the blue light leaking from the concrete modules in Kaiser Wilhelm Memorial Church, the light shining through the concrete beams in Maria Regina Martyrum Memorial Church, and the colors reflected from the stained glass in Paul Gerhardt Church. The role of religious buildings in the post-war Berlin brutalist practice, design parameters in the context of Reyner Banham's principles, and the spiritual effect of light were discussed through literature, periodicals, and visuals obtained through on-site documentation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A., “Aus Berliner Tagebuchnotizen,” Berner Schulblatt – L’Ecole Bernoise, no. 98, H:32/33 (1965): 567-569.

Banham, Reyner. The New Brutalism: Ethic or Aesthetic.London: Architectural Press, 1966.

Banham, Reyner. “The New Brutalism,” Architectural Review, (December 1955): 355-361.

Busse, Anette S. Im Spannungsfeld Brutalistischer StrÖmungen und Liturgischer Bewegung. Bauten der Nachkriegsmoderne von Klaus Franz. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing, 2020.

Fehling, Hermann, and Daniel Gogel. “Werkverzeichnis: vollständiges Werkverzeichnis, 1947-1988.” Baunen + Wohnen, no. 75 (1988): 58-70.

Holtorf, Cornelius. “Destruction and Reconstruction of Cultural Heritage as Future-Making.” In The Future of the Bamiyan Buddha Statues: Heritage Reconstruction in Theory and Practice, edited by Masanori Nagaoka, 157-172. Unesco Publishing, 2020.

Hubeli, Ernst. “Fehling und Gogel: signifikante Raumkonstruktionen = Constructions spatiales significatives = Significant spatial constructions.” Baunen + Wohnen, no. 75 (1988): 24-29.

James-Chakraborty, Kathleen. Modernism as Memory: Building Identity in the Federal Republic of Germany. Minneapolis&London: University of Minnesota Press, 2018.

Joedicke, Jürgen. “Kirchenbau in unserer Zeit: der Standpunkt des Arkitekten.” Bauen und Wohnen, no. 12 (1958): 354-358.

Kabierske, Gerhard. “Der Architekt Egon Eiermann und die Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gedächtnis-Kirche.” KWG Magazin (Oktober 2021: 6-11.

Klack, Gunnar. Gebaute Landschaften: Fehling + Gogel und die organische Architektur: Landschaft und Bewegung als Natur-Narrative. Biefield: Transcript, 2015.

Klopfleish, Sabine. Path of Remembrance. Memorial Area Charlottenburg-Nord. Bezirksamt Charlottenburg-Wilmersdorf von Berlin. Wirtschaftsförderung. Berlin: Pinguin Druck, 2021.

Ortner, Laurids. “Grossstädtisch werden: Projekte und Bauten in der Stadt von Haus Rucker & Co. Werk.” Bauen+Wohnen, no. 3 (1987): 24-35.

Pehnt, Wolfgang. German Architecture: 1960-1970. New York & Washington: Praeger Publishers, 1970.

Sarrazin, Otto, and Friedrich Schultze. “Paul-Gerhardt-Kirche in Schöneberg bei Berlin,” Zentralblatt der Bauverwaltung, no.1-2 (1911): 3-5.

Spindler, Ernst, and Bruno Möhring, eds. “Bilderstrecke”. Berliner Architekturwelt, no. 10, (1911): 397-400.

Torkar, Felix. Brutalist Berlin Map. London: Blue Crow Media, 2021.

Van Uffelen, Chris. Massive, Expressive, Sculptural: Brutalism Now and Then. Braun Publishing, 2018.

Voigt, Patrick, and Nikolaus Bernau. Beton und Glaube-Kirchen der Nachkriegsmoderne in Berlin. Berlin: Archipendiumedition, 2004.

“Vom Wiederaufbau der Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gedächtnis-Kirche in Berlin,” Bauen + Wohnen, no. 12 (1958): 10.

von Fischer, Sabine. “Risse, Spalten, Fugen: Spielraum im architektonischen Detail.” Bauen + Wohnen, no. 93 (2006): 44-53.

von Moos, Stanislaus. “Gedächtniskirche’ à la carte. Notes on the Political Fortunes of a Pile of Stones.” RA. Revista de Arquitectura, no. 25 (2023): 10-33.

Weber, Helmut. “Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gedächtniskirche Berlin – Qualität und Geschichte einer Instandsetzung.” Bautechnik, no. 84 (2006): 268-271.

Williams Goldhagen, Sarah. “Coda: Reconceptualizing the Modern.” In Anxious Modernisms: Experimentation in Postwar Architectural Culture, Sarah Williams Goldhagen, and Rejean Legault, eds. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2000.

Williams Goldhagen, Sarah, and Rejean Legault. “Critical Themes of Postwar Modernism.” In Anxious Modernisms: Experimentation in Postwar Architectural Culture, edited by Sarah Williams Goldhagen, and Rejean Legault. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2000.

Zill, Rüdiger. “‘A true witness of transience’: Berlin’s Kaiser- Wilhelm-Gedächtniskirche and the symbolic use of architectural fragments in modernity,” European Review of History: Revue europeenne d’histoire 18, no. 5-6 (2011): 811-827.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-16

How to Cite

Balcı Öztürk, Özlem, & Şenyurt, O. (2024). Brutalist Practice in 1960’s Berlin Churches: Experimental Interior Spaces. Histories of Postwar Architecture, 7(14), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2611-0075/20038