The New Brutalism: Ethic vs. Marxism? Ideological Collisions in Post-War English Architecture

Authors

  • Silvia Groaz École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, EPFL

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2611-0075/11436

Keywords:

New Brutalism, England, Reyner Banham, Alison and Peter Smithson, London County Council

Abstract

At the end of the Second World War, an intense ideological confrontation took place in England, where the principles of reconstruction were established around the ‘low rise’ and ‘high rise’ dichotomy. The debate was influenced by a politicized generational divide, pitting the legacy of Howard’s Garden City model, supported by those who called themselves ‘Marxists’, against Le Corbusier’s Unité at Marseille, defended by a younger generation of architects who took a ‘non-Marxist’ position. The various political tendencies were translated into stylistic rules that addressed types, city configuration, and even materials, according to a rich constellation of new labels: the New Humanism derived from Soviet Social Realism, the William Morris Revival and People’s Detailing, the New Picturesque advocated as a democratic model by Nikolaus Pevsner, and the New Empiricism reworked by Eric de Maré on the Cooperative Housing Schemes of the Swedish welfare state.
It is in this context that the New Brutalism originated. The term disguised subversive attributes with respect to the relationship of urban and architectural models with political demands. The rigid ideological instances that configured a conventional model for the reconstruction were purged in the New Brutalism through the introduction of a category that supplanted Marxist ideology. Ethics, translated into the truth to materials and structure, as well as into the concept of ‘as found’, paved its way through an argument rooted in the architectural discourse.

References

‘A Village Planned to Be Picturesque’. Architectural Review 95, no. 566 (February 1944): 39–43.

Aalto, Alvar. ‘The Humanizing of Architecture’. Architectural Forum 73 (December 1940): 505–6.

‘Architecture in the USSR’. RIBA Journal 48 (June 1941): 155–58.

Baker, Jeremy. ‘A Smithson File’. Arena, Architectural Association Journal 82, no. special issue (February 1966).

Banham, Reyner. Revenge of the Picturesque: English Archtiectural Polemics, 1945-65, Concerning Architecture: Essays on Architectural Writers and Writing Presented to Nikolaus Pevsner. London: Allen Lane, 1968.

———. ‘School at Hunstanton’. Architectural Review 116, no. 693 (September 1954): 150–62.

———. ‘The New Brutalism’. Architectural Review 118, no. 708 (December 1955): 354–61.

———. ‘The World of the Brutalists. Opinion & Intention in British Architecture, 1951-60’. Texas Quarterly 4, no. 3 (Fall 1961): 129–38.

———. ‘On Trial 5: The Spec Builders—Towards a Pop Architecture,’ Architectural Review (July 1962): 42.

———. ‘The Atavism of the Short-distance Mini-Cyclist’. Living Arts 3 (1963): 91-97.

———. The New Brutalism: Ethic or Aesthetic? London: Architectural Press, 1966.

Boyd, Andrew. ‘A Review of the Symposium - The Kind of Architecture We Want in Britain’. Keystone, May 1949, 96.

Bullock, Nicholas. Building the Post-War World: Modern Architecture and Reconstruction in Britain. London: Routledge, 2002.

———. ‘La politica del London County Council 1945-1951’. Rassegna 54, no. 2 (June 1993): 50–57.

Darling, Elizabeth. Re-Forming Britain : Narratives of Modernity before Reconstruction. New York: Routledge, 2007.

Day, Nicholas Merhyr. ‘The Role of the Architect in Post-War Housing: A Case Study of the Housing Work of the London County Council 1939 - 1956’. University of Warwick, 1988.

Edman, Bengt, and Lennart Holm. ‘Tegelspråk’. Tegel 40, no. 2 (1950): 46–50.

Erten, Erden. Alternative Visions of Post-War Reconstruction: Creating the Modern Townscape. London: Routledge, 2015.

Forty, Adrian. ‘Reyner Banham, “One Partially Americanized European”’, in Louise Campbell (ed.), Twentieth-Century Architecture and Its Histories, (London: Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain, 2000): 195–205.

Fry, Maxwell. ‘The Future of Architecture’. Architects’ Year Book 1, no. 1 (1945): 7–10. Gloag, John. The English Tradition of Design. London, 1947.

Heuvel, Dirk van den. ‘Alison and Peter Smithson: A Brutalist Story, Involving the House, the City and the Everyday (Plus a Couple of Other Things)’. TU Delft, 2013.

Higgott, Andrew. Mediating Modernism: Architectural Cultures in Britain. London: Routledge, 2006.

Holm, Lennart. ‘Ideologi Och Form’. Byggmästaren 27, no. 15 (1948): 264–72.

Hulten, Bertil. Building Modern Sweden. London: Penguin, 1951.

Kite, Stephen. ‘Softs and Hards: Colin St. John Wilson and the Contested Vision of 1950s London’. In Neo-Avant-Garde and Postmodern. Postwar Architecture in Britain and Beyond, edited by Mark Crinson and Claire Zimmerman. London: YC British Art, 2010.

———, Sarah Menin (ed.), An Architecture of Invitation (London: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2005).

London County Council Division. ‘Le Corbusier’s Unité d’Habitation’. Architectural Review 109 (May 1951): 292–300.

Maré, Eric de. ‘Et Tu, Brute?’ Architectural Review 120, no. 08.1956 (August 1956): 72.

———. ‘The Antecedents and Origins of Sweden’s Last Style’. Architectural Review 103, no. 623 (January 1948): 8–22.

———. ‘The New Empiricism: Sweden Last Style’. Architectural Review 102, no. 606 (June 1947): 199–204.

‘Marseille Building Experiment: Symbol of L.C.C. Dispute’. Manchester Guardian, September 1952.

Osborn, Frederic J. ‘Concerning Le Corbusier. Part I’. Town & Country Planning 20, no. 99 (July 1952): 311–16.

———. ‘Concerning Le Corbusier. Part II’. Town & Country Planning 20, no. 100 (August 1952): 359–63.

Pevsner, Nikolaus. ‘A Short Pugin Florilegium’. Architectural Review 94, no. 560 (August 1943): 31–34.

———. ‘Art for Everyone: Art and the State’. London: BBC Radio, 16 June 1946.

———. ‘Roehampton, LCC Housing and the Picturesque Tradition’. Architectural Review 125, no. 750 (July 1959): 21–35.

———. ‘The Genesis of the Picturesque’. Architectural Review 96 (November 1944): 139–46.

‘Radiant City Lawsuit: Complaint of Brutal Realism’. The Times, April 1952.

Read, Herbert. ‘A New Humanism’. Architectural Review 78 (October 1935): 47–48.

‘Rebuilding Britain’. Architectural Review 93, no. 556 (April 1943): 85–112.

Robertson, Howard P. Architecture Arising. London: Faber & Faber, 1944.

Scott, Geoffrey. The Architecture of Humanism: A Study in the Histry of Taste. Boston/New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1914.

Smith, Otto Saumarez. ‘Graeme Shankland: A Sixties Architect-Planner and the Political Culture of the British Left’. Architectural History 57 (2014): 393–422.

Smithson, Alison and Peter. ‘House in Soho’. Architectural Design 23, no. 12 (December 1953): 342.

———. ‘En Ny Engelsk Skola’. Byggmästaren 34, no. A6 (5 June 1955): 159–62.

———. ‘The New Brutalism: Alison and Peter Smithson Answer the Criticism on the Opposite Page’. Architectural Design 27, no. 4 (April 1957): 113.

———., Jane Drew, Maxwell Fry. ‘Conversation on Brutalism’. Zodiac 4 (April 1959): 73–81.

———. ‘Banham’s Bumper Book on Brutalism, Discussed by Alison and Peter Smithson’. Architects’ Journal 144, no. 26 (28 December 1966): 1590–91.

St. John Wilson, Colin. ‘The Vertical City’. The Observer, 17 February 1952.

‘The New Humanism’. Architects’ Journal 96, no. 575 (November 1944): 375–76. Whiteley, Nigel. Reyner Banham: Historian of the Immediate Future. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002.

Wittkower, Rudolf. Architectural Principles in the Age of Humanism. Vol. 19. Studies of the Warburg Institute. London: Warburg Institute, University of London, 1949.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-12

How to Cite

Groaz, S. (2020). The New Brutalism: Ethic vs. Marxism? Ideological Collisions in Post-War English Architecture. Histories of Postwar Architecture, 4(7), 104–123. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2611-0075/11436